Wednesday, March 31, 2010

LetterMeLater.com - Schedule Email to be Sent Later Automatically

LetterMeLater.com - Schedule Email to be Sent Later Automatically

I just got a letter from a church member wanting something in our bulletin, not this Sunday, but the next two Sundays. I need to be sure I:

  1. Don't forget to put the announcement in the bulletin and
  2. Can find the information when I need it.
It would have been easy if she'd emailed me after I had done this week's bulletin, I could just go ahead and put it in. So I just forwarded the email to myself, in the future.

I have an account with LetterMeLater.com. It allows me to forward the email to me@lettermelater.com. At the top of the body of the message I fill in the following information.

To: myself@mydomain.com
When: Monday 9:00am

So, next Monday her email will show up again in my inbox, and I can go ahead and put her announcement in the bulletin. If you need to send emails to yourself or others, but need them delayed until a future date or time, LetterMeLater.com is a great tool. The free account allows you to schedule up to 30 emails per month, and to send each one to up to 10 different recipients. If you need to send more, you can upgrade your account for $20/yr.

Leave a comment and tell me how you could benefit from being able to schedule your emails for a future date or time.
Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

It's Like Herding Cats - A pastor's life: It'll Be Coming Down in Buckets!

It's going to rain hope in Haiti. It'll come down in buckets. Hundreds of thousands of them. And families will know that God cares for them and has put His people on the problem.

My friend David Wilson blogs about his church's contribution of 20 buckets of food to provide relief in earthquake ravaged Haiti. I found his words very inspiring, and considering that our church like his provided 20 buckets, I thought they might inspire you too!

Thanks David for a good word.

Posted via web from First Baptist Lovejoy


Share/Bookmark

In utopia there is universal health care coverage and freedom. This isn't utopia: You choose

Freedom isn't free. It is bought with the blood of patriots. It is sustained by the exercise of personal responsibility of those who live under it's umbrella. In the wake of the Great Depression we sold a portion of our freedom in order to have the government provide us with retirement benefits. This week congress will seek to force Americans to exchange their freedom for the illusion of guaranteed affordable health care. Every tyrant comes to power by promising the people a rescue from some great fear.

No one wants to be without access to health care. All of us feel compassion for those who don't have, can't get, or cannot afford health insurance. But the price for universal coverage is a loss of freedom. The government will interfere in the free market and tell corporations who they can and cannot insure. Many of those "evil insurance companies" are owned by people like me and you if we have money invested in mutual funds. If you have an IRA or a 401k, that's YOUR business that the government is interfering with.

In order to "provide" coverage for those with pre-existing conditions, the federal government will force you to buy insurance whether you want it or not. They have to do this to keep people from gaming the system. Otherwise people wouldn't buy coverage until they developed a major illness. This would bankrupt the system. You are wise to have health insurance long before you become ill, but in a free country, you have the freedom to do so or not.

I have compassion for those who have serious illnesses and who cannot get access to insurance. I think charitable, loving, kindhearted people should give freely and help those in their circle of influence get the care they need. I don't think it is the responsibility of a government of free peoples to seize money from some of it's citizens, whether they are stockholders of insurance companies, young healthy adults who are making a free choice to spend their money on something other than health insurance, or any other American taxpayer, in order to provide that health care to those who don't have it.

We can have universal health care, for a while. Eventually as we continue down the path of expecting the government to provide the needs of the people, there will be too many receiving benefits, and too few paying in. The system will collapse. When that happens we will have mortgaged our freedoms and have no house of health care to show for it.

Share/Bookmark

Tom Hanks doesn't understand that racism was a coping tool, not a reason for WWII

In defending his comments that the war in the Pacific was racially motivated, Hanks cites hearing many people use racial epithets of the Japanese in that era. While those epithets were certainly used, that does not make them the motivation for the war. We also used epithets in the Atlantic theater, like calling the Germans "krauts".

The fact is that anytime one goes to war one of the coping mechanisms that makes war possible is the dehumanizing of the enemy. There is an instant reaction when one is attacked, i.e. in Pearl Harbor or in the WTC attacks of 9/11/2001 to vilify and dehumanize those who have attacked us. And in order to fight back, we dehumanize them further. In order to be able to mentally and emotionally deal with the horrific acts of war soldiers come up with all kinds of names, some racially based, for their enemies. That does not make either racism or ignorance the reason for the war. The reason for the war in the Pacific was that the Japanese wanted to control the Pacific, and tried to cripple us by bombing Pearl Harbor in order to do so.

The reason for the war in the Atlantic was to stop the aggression and genocide of the German regime. I have been a lifelong fan of Hanks screen work, but if he can't tell the difference in a reason for a war and a coping mechanism in the midst of war, then he is the one who is displaying ignorance.

Posted via email from It's Just a Thought


Share/Bookmark

Fox Compares Health Care Debate to Alice in Wonderland


Share/Bookmark

southbaybiblechurch.org :: View topic - PowerPoint Backgrounds for Worship -- Lighter Backgrounds


Share/Bookmark

Sermon for Next Sunday, Via Dolorosa -- Luke 23:26-49

Via Dolorsa 


Down the Via Dolorosa in Jerusalem that day
The soldiers tried to clear the narrow street
But the crowd pressed in to see
A Man condemned to die on Calvary

He was bleeding from a beating, there were stripes upon His back
And He wore a crown of thorns upon His head
And He bore with every step
The scorn of those who cried out for His death

Down the Via Dolorosa called the way of suffering
Like a lamb came the Messiah, Christ the King,
But He chose to walk that road out of
His love for you and me.
Down the Via Dolorosa, all the way to Calvary.

Por la Via Dolorosa, triste dia en Jerusalem
Los saldados le abrian paso a Jesus
Mas la gente se acercaba
Para ver al que llevaba aquella cruz

Por la Via Dolorosa, que es la via del dolor
Como oveja vino Cristo, Rey, Senor
Y fue El quien quiso ir por su amor por ti y por mi
Por la Via Dolorosa al Calvario y a morir

The blood that would cleanse the souls of all men
Made its way through the heart of Jerusalem.

Down the Via Dolorosa called the way of suffering
Like a lamb came the Messiah, Christ the King
But He chose to walk that road out of His love for you and me
Down the Via Dolorosa, all the way to Calvary.
Share/Bookmark

Saturday, March 13, 2010

Fun at the Sr. Adult Breakfast

The Lovejoy Community Center hosts a breakfast for senior adults in the area on the second Saturday of each month. It's a lot of fun. Two of our members, Peggy Banks and Thomas Downer were there. And of course free food always attracts a Baptist Preacher.

Posted via email from It's Just a Thought


Share/Bookmark

Friday, March 12, 2010

Break the Microsoft Office Addiction: don't buy Microsoft Office 2010

Mike Hardin's office and software Bookmarks

Bookmarks | Network | Tags | Subscriptions | Inbox
It'll soon be time to pay Microsoft to upgrade your office suite again. Why not consider one of these free alternatives. They both open documents in and save documents to Microsoft formats. Break the addiction!

Share/Bookmark

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Organizing for Tax Preparation with Remember the Milk

http://blog.rememberthemilk.com/2010/03/tips-tricks-tuesday-tracking-tax-paperwork/

I have several clients who email me their paper work each year for me to prepare their returns. More often than not there is something missing and I have to call or email them to ask about the missing information. I have to confess I've even filed incomplete returns for myself, and had to amend them later to add the missing information.

There is an article on the Remember the Milk blog today about using this online task management list to make sure you have all your documents together before you either send them off to your preparer, or sit down to prepare your own return. I'm a big fan of Remember the Milk, but I've never used it for this. I may start next year though.

Leave a comment and let me know how you organize for tax season.

Posted via email from Mike Hardin tax service


Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Baptist Press - Study: Cohabiting normative but harmful

Baptist Press - Study: Cohabiting normative but harmful - News with a Christian Perspective

As she looked at the young lady's new engagement ring, the pastor's wife said, "That's beautiful! Have you two picked a date?"

The young lady replied, "We're thinking next April (over a year away) because we've only been in our house for four months."

The clear indication is that this young lady speaking to her pastor and his wife thinks the normal and wise course is to 1) cohabit, 2) become engaged, and 3) get married. There was a time when even if a person chose to do this, they wouldn't expect the church, especially not the pastor or his wife to approve. Clearly we are living in a post-modern, post-Christian culture, even in what was formerly the Bible belt.
Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, March 09, 2010

Ministering at the Detention Facility Tonight

The second Tuesday night of each month is my turn to preach at a Federal Detention Center in our community. I signed up for it to set an example for others in our church, hoping we might have several involved. So far it's just a retired pastor and me. And I confess. I'm tired of it. I don't want to go tonight. I want to go home and hang out with my family, maybe even go to bed early. I never want to go to the prison anymore. But, I know I will be glad I did. You see, I've felt like this for a year. And without exception I leave saying, "I'm really glad I came tonight!" God always blesses my faithfulness and my willingness to serve. So why can't I translate that into excitement and a positive attitude before I go?


Matthew 25:35-36 (NIV)
35 For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, 36 I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.'

Share/Bookmark

Sending a Message with the Census - Mark Krikorian - The Corner on National Review Online

Fully one-quarter of the space on this year's form is taken up with questions of race and ethnicity, which are clearly illegitimate and none of the government's business

The only constitutional purpose of the census is to determine how many seats each state gets in Congress. Yet it is illegal to lie on the census, or to refuse to answer any questions. Here is one honorable, constitutional approach to at least one of the unconstitutional questions.

Posted via web from It's Just a Thought


Share/Bookmark

Monday, March 08, 2010

» Health Care and the Left’s Perverted Definition of ‘Rights’ - Big Government

Health Care and the Left’s Perverted Definition of ‘Rights’

by Kerry J. Byrne
One way that leftists have managed to keep alive their dead, defeated, bankrupting theories on issues like so-called health care is by perverting the definition of very basic terms.
The word “right” is one of the most glaring examples of a definition that’s been distorted by the intellectual house-of-horrors mirror that is leftist theory.
Image Source: CATO Institute
Image: CATO Institute
Every American has the “right” to health care they argue.
They’re right. Every American does have a right to health care. In fact, they have that “right” right now. They have the right to buy insurance. They have the right to not buy insurance. They have the right to pay out of pocket. They have the right get a second opinion. They have the right to rub a little dirt on it and suck it up. They have a right to help out  a friend in need.
What they don’t have is the “right” to health care in the perverted leftist sense of the word.
A “right,” in the traditional American lexicon laid out by the likes of Thomas Jefferson, is something that exists by virtue of our humanity. It is “inalienable” and we are endowed with these rights by our creator. No government or institution has the power to take away these rights. You exist, therefore these rights exist.
In the leftist sense of the word, though, a “right” is something very different. In fact, it’s not a “right” at all: it’s a handout provided to you by government, often at exorbitant costs to society.
“I have the ‘right’ to health care!” the leftists demand angrily. “Therefore, the government must provide it for me!”

Rights, in other words, are not innate to your humanity in leftist theory. Instead, rights are bequeathed to you like party favors by political Big Brothers: here’s a do-nothing job for Uncle Henry, here’s a tax exemption for a big donor and … oh, look, here’s some discounted healthcare for members of the big unions that support me.
The “right” to health care in leftist theory, then, is not something that you possess inalienably by virtue of your humanity. Instead, a “right” to them is a dehumanizing tragedy in the making.
The government that gives you your “right” to health care can just as easily deny you that so-called “right” to health care. They can take it away at anytime: if you end up in the wrong column of an actuarial chart, if you vote the wrong way, or, hell, in the very likely event that the system goes bankrupt, the government will be in a position to deny what once was your inalienable “right” to health care. Remember, the Soviet Union declared that its citizens had the right to everything from a home to a job. How’d that work out for them?
“B-b-b-b-b-but!,” scream the leftists. “Insurance companies can already deny you health care.”
No, they can’t. Insurance companies are certainly part of the problem. We’ve grown to depend on them too much and on ourselves too little. The system does need to be fixed.
But insurance companies cannot deny you the inalienable ”right” to health care. They do not have that power. They can only choose not to pay for certain procedures. You can still find another insurance company, seek help in a different state, find a charitable doctor to pay for it, benefit from a fundraiser or, worst-case scenario, benefit from the generosity of a well-funded, for-profit private health care institution.
After all, you still have the “right” to find that care. Even in a worst-case scenario in the current system, you only need the means.
But when government monopolizes the system, when government first decides what kind of care you’ll get, and when government next decides if they’ll even pay for it, your right to health care no longer exists.
At best, your rights will be forced underground into a health care black market: doctors illegally providing care in a cash-only medical economy – but probably one better than the legit “health care” system where patients have no rights but those regally gifted to them by the lords of big government (who, themselves, will never be denied care).
Look at Canada: it already has a vibrant cash-only medical economy. It’s called the U.S. health care system.
Your “right” to health care already exists. Don’t let the leftist and their perverted definition of the word take it away.
In the debate over the "right to affordable health care" Byrne talks about the changing definition of a right. The rights identified in our constitution were not given by the government, they were endowed on us by God by virtue of a humanity. The constitution, specifically the bill of rights, simply prohibits the government from infringing upon those rights.
But in this cry for everyone having their right to affordable health care, a right has been redefined from being a gift of God on which government cannot infringe, to an entitlement for which government must provide. With that definition of rights, how long can it be before our treasury collapses under the weight of it's self-imposed responsibility to provide it's citizenry with their "rights"?
I can't find a "right to health care" in our constitution. But for the sake of argument let's assume it falls under the "right to life" umbrella. Doesn't telling the citizenry they must buy insurance, or use a particular doctor, or follow receive treatment or be denied treatment based on some bureaucratic policy infringe on that right, rather than safeguard it.
You already have the right to health care. You also have the responsibility to fund that right. Byrne talks about some of the options you have to do that. As soon as you expect the government to provide it for you it will cease to be a right and become an entitlement that can and will, be taken away as the system collapses.

Share/Bookmark

Boortz: OBAMA ...sending the national debt soaring to 90% of the economy by 2020

via Nealz Nuze on 3/8/10

There is one thing that Democrats, Republicans and Independents can all agree on - the debt we owe is our greatest long-term threat to national security. By a two-to-one margin, Americans of all demographics and political parties believe that the amount of money we owe to China is now a greater long-term threat than radical Islam. They're right, but it's must worse than that. The level of debt facing this country will destroy the dreams of our children and grandchildren. It is hard to imagine that future generations will have the opportunity to pursue anything close to the lifestyle we enjoy as they are faced with this crushing debt to retire.

Just how bad is this problem? Read on .....

Last Friday, the Congressional Budget office released a report stating that our projected debt is actually going to be much higher than the White House predicted. Wow! Now who didn't see THAT coming? The CBO says that Obama's budget is going to lead to annual deficits averaging $1 trillion for the next decade. The White House's prediction was an annual budget shortfall of $853 billion for the next decade. Why the discrepancy? Obama expects to bring in more tax revenue. The CBO, on the other hand, does not believe the Obama economy will be able to generate the tax revenue because it expects less economic growth. In fact, the CBO predicts that the deficit will never fall below 4% of the GDP under Obama's policies and "would begin to grow rapidly after 2015."

(By the way, as of right now our predicted annual deficit for this year is $1.5 trillion - a post WWII record at 10.3% of our economy.)

But back to this report ... the CBO says that deficits of that magnitude would force the Treasury to continue borrowing at prodigious rates, sending the national debt soaring to 90% of the economy by 2020, while interest payments on the debt would also skyrocket by $800 billion over the same period.

Speaking of interest rates, Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell puts our interest rates into perspective. He says, " ... in just four years the administration predicts the government will have to spend more just to pay interest on the federal debt than it spends on the Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Education, Energy, Health and Human Services, HUD (Housing and Urban Development), Interior, Justice, Labor, State, Treasury, and the Corps of Engineers, Environment Protection Agency, GSA (General Services Administration), NASA, National Science Foundation, Small Business Administration and the Social Security Administration -- combined."

Posted via email from It's Just a Thought


Share/Bookmark

Sunday, March 07, 2010

He's Still Working On Me ~ SG Artists kids

For my friend @talkofthesouth and all the others who are glad God isn't going to leave us like we are.

Posted via web from It's Just a Thought!


Share/Bookmark

Saturday, March 06, 2010

Fox News: Marriages that have lasted 10 years or Longer

Report from CDC odds of marriage lasting over 10 years for those who lived together before marriage: 61% for women and 63%. For those who NEVER lived together the odds of success in marriage re 66% for women and 69% for men.

The older couples are when they marry (first marriages) the greater the chance of success.

Other findings:

— The odds of staying together 10 years or longer in a first marriage are better for couples of the same racial origin, the report found.

— Nearly 80 percent of couples who have their first child at least eight months after their first marriage are likely to celebrate their 10th anniversary; those who don't have children are more than twice as likely not to last 10 years.

— About 75 percent of marriages between men and women 26 years old or older last at least 10 years, compared with only about half of teen marriages.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,587763,00.html


Posted via email from It's Just a Thought!


Share/Bookmark

Friday, March 05, 2010

Healthy Kingdom Church retreat notes


Share/Bookmark

Spiritual Reflections: Confessions of a Recovering Christian

Marshall Davis took a stand for Biblical standards of morality, sexuality, and church polity, and paid the price. And yet he still loves the church who persecuted him. A great read.

Posted via web from It's Just a Thought!


Share/Bookmark

Brent Bozell III Chronicles A Year of Anti-Religious Bigotry

Bozell argues that the Catholic Church is "the last acceptable prejudice". I actually think that the prejudice is directed toward Christendom at large, with Catholicism, because it is the largest Christian denomination in the United States and in the world, being the symbol for all the rest.
Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, March 03, 2010

Just four of several big problems with the current tax code.

First is the corrupting influence on Congress of the power to use it inappropriately.  Second is the inequities that result from favoritism and unequal treatment of taxpayers.  Third is the non-productive work and un-necessary expense required to figure out what we owe.  Fourth  is the invasion of privacy required for citizens to comply with all the rules.

Just four of several big problems with the current tax code. http://fairtax.org

Posted via web from It's Just a Thought!


Share/Bookmark

Write Your Own Healthcare Bill

The drama in Washington never seems to stop over health care. And if getting health care legislation depends on getting Republicans and Democrats to find common ground, then it's a dream at best. I'm a firm believer that what makes the United States great is that the people are independent and do not wait on the government to take care of them, but are determined to take care of themselves. With that in mind, let me suggest how you should write your own health care bill.

Get Health Insurance When You Don't Need It
One of the biggest issues is the inability to get coverage for pre-existing conditions. Some want to make insurance companies out to be evil villains for not covering these conditions, but it really just makes sense that they wouldn't. The purpose of an insurance company is to take on part of your risk in exchange for your premiums. So when you are healthy you pay the insurance company to cover you in the event you develop cancer, heart disease, diabetes, or any of a number of ailments. If people don't get insurance when they are healthy, and then come seeking a policy when they have a condition, it's no longer a risk, it's a certain liability. This is the reason that the democrats insist on mandating coverage if they are going to require insurance companies to cover people with pre-existing conditions. It keeps people from gaming the system by waiting until they are less healthy to buy insurance.  Thank goodness we still live in a free country where you are not (yet) mandated to buy insurance if you don't want it. However, having the freedom not to buy doesn't make it smart.

Understand the purpose of Health Insurance
There is a perception in our nation that the purpose of Insurance is to pay your health care costs. Just seems obvious, that's why it's called Health Insurance, right?  Wrong. Remember, the purpose of buying insurance is to pay someone else to protect you from a risk. If we want to be healthy, we plan to have regular checkups, dental cleanings, eye exams, etc.  And we expect some minor illnesses in our family each year. Those are not risks, those are reasonably planned expenses. One of the reasons health care insurance has become so expensive is that we expect it to pay for expenses we know we will incur. That really isn't a good use for insurance. It comes from an idea that says I'm not responsible for my own expenses, I want someone else to take care of me.

The real purpose of health insurance is not to pay for your health care, it is to protect your assets. That is, if you have catastrophic expenses, you would not want to lose your home, or your retirement nest egg, to have to pay medical bills. This is why I'm a big believer in a high deductible insurance plan. This plan means I'm not likely to cost the insurance company anything as long as I am just getting routine medical care and treatment for minor illnesses and injuries. As such they can charge me much lower premiums.

Become Self-Insured
Take the savings from those lower premiums and put them in a tax sheltered Health Savings Account (HSA). For a person in a 15% federal and 5% state income tax bracket you will save 20 cents in taxes on every dollar you put into your HSA. So if your premiums are going to be $200 per month lower for your high deductible policy than for a traditional policy, you could afford to put $240 ($200 + $40 in tax savings) per month in your HSA. Also consider how much your deductible would have been on the traditional plan. If you would have had a $500 deductible, then that's money you would have spent anyway. If you put that $500 plus another $100 in tax savings into your HSA, you now have it up to $290 per month with just money you were already going to spend. But it gets better than that. How much do you spend out of pocket each year for over the counter medications, eyeglasses, dental visits, and other cost not covered by your medical insurance?  All of that can be paid from your HSA also. If you spend $600 a year (to make the math easy) that's another $60 a month you can put in your HSA ($50 expenses and $10 in tax savings). That brings your total up to $350 per month, $4,200 per year, that you can put into your HSA. As long as your medical expenses are not catastrophic, this will more than cover the size deductible required become eligible for one of these plans. If you do have a catastrophic event, that's what the insurance is there for.

If you can afford to pay for routine visits, over the counter medications, etc. without tapping into this account, so much the better. It grows tax free and will give you a great safety net in the future. If you need it though, it's always there. If you can afford to put more than just what you are saving by switching to a high deductible plan in it, by all means do so. The limit for a family is $6,150 in 2010.

Plan for unemployment
One of the great things about the HSA is that it can be used to pay insurance premiums on COBRA. COBRA allows an employee to keep their insurance for a period of time after leaving their employer, but they must pay the premiums out of pocket. If you lose your job due to a layoff, it's difficult enough to pay ordinary living expenses, much less the full premium that previously was paid by, or at least subsidized by, your employer. Switching to a high deductible plan with an HSA now allows you to begin building cash reserves that could help you pay those premiums until you find other employment. This not only keeps you insured in the short term, it helps avoid becoming uninsured and getting caught in that "pre-existing condition" trap.

Posted via email from mikehardin's posterous


Share/Bookmark